<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/issue_description/107</link>
 <description>Core Issue Description (w arg handling)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>OVERVIEW</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22301</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot; /&gt;
&lt;meta name=&quot;ProgId&quot; content=&quot;Word.Document&quot; /&gt;
&lt;meta name=&quot;Generator&quot; content=&quot;Microsoft Word 12&quot; /&gt;
&lt;meta name=&quot;Originator&quot; content=&quot;Microsoft Word 12&quot; /&gt;
&lt;link href=&quot;file:///C:%5CUsers%5CADAMTH%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml&quot; rel=&quot;File-List&quot; /&gt;
&lt;link href=&quot;file:///C:%5CUsers%5CADAMTH%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_themedata.thmx&quot; rel=&quot;themeData&quot; /&gt;
&lt;link href=&quot;file:///C:%5CUsers%5CADAMTH%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_colorschememapping.xml&quot; rel=&quot;colorSchemeMapping&quot; /&gt;
&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
&lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;
&lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;
&lt;object
	classid=&quot;clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D&quot; id=ieooui&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;style&gt;
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;style&gt;
&lt;/style&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;
&lt;style&gt;
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:&quot;Table Normal&quot;;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:&quot;&quot;;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;}
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;![endif]--&gt;The great majority of employers want to provide health care benefits to
employees and their families.  Despite a
steady decline in the percentage of Americans with employer-based coverage,
from 66% of Americans under age 65 in 2000 to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/7599.pdf&quot;&gt;61% in 2004&lt;/a&gt;, employers
still cover more than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparebar.jsp?ind=125&amp;amp;cat=3&quot;&gt;158
million Americans&lt;/a&gt;, more than twice the number of Americans who receive
Medicaid or Medicare.  Because of the
financial contributions employers make to health
care, ensuring strong employer participation in health care reform is
a key priority. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Employer Mandates:&lt;/b&gt;  As
part of comprehensive reforms, Massachusetts,
Vermont,
and San Francisco require all
employers to provide some degree of health coverage for their employees or
pay a fee to help finance health care programs. 
The main goal is to ensure that &amp;quot;low road&amp;quot; employers are not
dumping their health care costs onto the public and gaining an unfair
competitive advantage against employers who do provide coverage.  Despite a precipitous national decline in
employer-based coverage and warnings from critics that state-funded programs
would &amp;quot;crowd-out&amp;quot; private insurance, Massachusetts has seen a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/health/policy/03health.html?partner=rssnyt&amp;amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;3%
increase&lt;/a&gt; in employer-based coverage. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;/content/342/072406-debate-on-health-care-for-all-gets-real#2&quot; title=&quot;San Francisco&#039;s comprehensive health care law&quot;&gt;San Francisco&#039;s law&lt;/a&gt;
has the strongest employer mandate, requiring employers with 20 or more
employees to provide health care or pay the city $1.17 to $1.76 per hour
depending on firm size. Employers have tried to challenge the law in court, but
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/22/BAEKV6KF2.DTL&quot;&gt;recent
court decisions&lt;/a&gt; have allowed the city to continue with the mandate during
the appeal process.  This bodes well for
the program and employer mandates elsewhere. 
&lt;i&gt;Healthy Wisconsin&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s proposed employer
and employee payroll-fee, which replaces monthly premiums, is a form of
employer mandate.  In many ways, its
payroll-fee creates the most equitable approach to employer responsibility,
since its sliding scale payment structure is directly proportional to an
employer&#039;s ability to pay.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Public/Private
Partnerships: &lt;/b&gt;Many states have developed programs that contract with
private carriers and offer coverage to individuals and small
businesses.  These typically offer
insurance-like coverage administered by public and private entities coupled
with sliding scale subsidies or premiums available to people with income up to
300% of the poverty line.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class=&quot;unIndentedList&quot;&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;b&gt;Contracting with Insurers:&lt;/b&gt; Vermont&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://familiesusa.org/assets/pdfs/vt-catamount-health.pdf&quot;&gt;Catamount
	Health Plan&lt;/a&gt;and Maine&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.communitycatalyst.org/projects/schap/links?id=0008&quot;&gt;DirigoChoice
	insurance program&lt;/a&gt;contract with private carriers to offer a
	comprehensive benefits package with sliding scale premiums or subsidies to
	people with incomes up to 300% of poverty.
	In case private carriers do not participate, each stateis
	authorized to offer the coverage through a public entity. Both programs are available to individuals
	and small business employees. Maine&#039;s
	program is available to small businesses as long as employers cover 60% of an
	employee&#039;s premium. It is also available
	to employees eligible for Medicaid and provides a wrap-around benefit to ensure
	those employees receive the full range of Medicaid services. New Mexico&#039;s&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.statecoverage.net/profiles/newmexico.htm&quot;&gt;State Coverage
	Insurance&lt;/a&gt; program offers coverage to individuals and small business
	employees with incomes up to 200% of the poverty line. Importantly, the program
	limits total out of pocket costs to 5% of a family&#039;s income. &lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;b&gt;New Regulatory Agencies:&lt;/b&gt; Massachusetts&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mahealthconnector.org/portal/site/connector/&quot;&gt;Commonwealth
	Connector&lt;/a&gt; negotiates and contracts with private insurers to bring more
	affordable insurance options to market for individuals and small businesses.
	The state &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.communitycatalyst.org/projects/schap/links?id=0006&quot;&gt;created&lt;/a&gt;
	Commonwealth Care, a program offering subsidized coverage toadults with
	incomes up to 300% of the poverty line and who are not eligible for Medicaid,
	andCommonwealth Choice, a similar program that offers non-subsidized
	health plans to individuals, documented immigrants, families, and small
	businesses. Both Commonwealth programs
	are administeredby the Connector. As Community Catalyst &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.communitycatalyst.org/projects/schap/links?id=0026&quot;&gt;describes&lt;/a&gt;,
	connectors create a common marketplace for consumers to compare
	options,and they work best with other insurance reforms like guaranteed
	issue, community rating, and standardized benefit plans.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Resources:&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Families USA
and Community Catalyst - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.communitycatalyst.org/projects/schap/links?id=0010&quot;&gt;A Consumer
Guide to State Health Reform: Employer Buy-In Programs&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Families USA
and Community Catalyst - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.communitycatalyst.org/projects/schap/links?id=0006&quot;&gt;A Consumer
Guide to State Health Reform: Expanding Public Coverage to Non-Medicaid
Populations&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
December 2006 Urban Institute paper - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/7599.pdf&quot;&gt;Changes in
Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Sponsorship, Eligibility, and
Participation: 2001 to 2005&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Commonwealth Fund - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=243629&quot;&gt;Stretching
State Health Care Dollars: Building on Employer-Based Coverage&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Massachusetts
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mahealthconnector.org/portal/site/connector/&quot;&gt;Commonwealth
Connector&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://progressivestates.org/node/22301#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/107">Strengthen Employer Responsibility for Health Care</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Thompson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22301 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
