<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/policy/issue/107/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Simple Approach for Expanding Eligibility to Health Insurance</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22516</link>
 <description>In New York State, 31% of uninsured residents are young adults between
the ages 19 and 29. To help this population and reduce the state&#039;s
uninsured rolls, Governor Paterson wants to require private employers
to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/nyregion/07state.html?emc=eta1&quot;&gt;offer health insurance to workers&#039; dependents&lt;/a&gt;
who are between the ages 19 and 29.  The proposal would expand
eligibility to some 800,000 uninsured New Yorkers and the Governor&#039;s
Office projects about 80,000 would take advantage of the new rule.
According to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/nyregion/07state.html?emc=eta1&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,
business groups appear to be supportive of the idea, which would not
require employers to help pay for coverage, merely to make it available.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22516&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/107">Strengthen Employer Responsibility for Health Care</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/16">Iowa</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/31">New Jersey</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:31:23 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Thompson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22516 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A First Look at How McCain and Obama&#039;s Policies Would Affect the States</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22112</link>
 <description>There are stark differences between the two presidential campaigns&#039;
approaches to federal-state relationships.  Differences range from the
amount of funding appropriated for programs run by the states to
whether the candidates would strengthen or weaken state regulatory
authority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22112&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1748">Necessary Components of Comprehensive Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1764">Deployment Plans and Partnerships</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1818">Protecting Gay Civil Unions and Marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/99">Family Leave</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/204">Improve Transit Options</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/210">Sun, Wind and Bio-Based Power</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/211">Clean Energy Funding</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/114">Health Insurance Regulations to Ensure Fairness and Access</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/205">Promote Low Emission, Fuel-Efficient Cars</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/111">Using Medicaid and SCHIP to Cover Adults</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1752">Improve Access to Private Coverage</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/107">Strengthen Employer Responsibility for Health Care</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1753">Funding Health Care Expansions</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1">All 50 States</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:55:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22112 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court Upholds Employer Health Care Responsibility Policies</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22005</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In a case with national implications for state health reform across  the country, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals this week in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/7247887E88BB6AE7882574D3007D1157/$file/0717370.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Golden Gate Rest. Ass&#039;n v. San Francisco&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; upheld the employer responsibility provisions of the San Francisco universal health care plan.  The decision follows a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/content/749/health-care-employer-mandate-approved-by-appeals-court-in-landmark-decision#1&quot;&gt;preliminary decision&lt;/a&gt; earlier in the year that allowed the plan to be initially implemented. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22005&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/163">Federal Preemption Must Be Explicit</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/107">Strengthen Employer Responsibility for Health Care</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/6">California</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/22">Massachusetts</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:45:06 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Thompson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22005 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Businesses Failing to Provide Health Care to Pay Increased Assessments under MA Governor&#039;s Proposal</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/21980</link>
 <description>To close funding gaps in the state&#039;s new health care law and encourage
more employers to provide health coverage for their employees,
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick this week &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=53304&quot;&gt;proposed raising an additional $33 million&lt;/a&gt;
from employers with more than 10 workers who don&#039;t contribute at least
one-third of workers&#039; premiums within the first 90 days of employment
and don&#039;t have at least 25% of their employees enrolled in insurance
plans.  The plan would raise additional funds by assessing fees on
insurers&#039; reserve accounts. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/21980&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/107">Strengthen Employer Responsibility for Health Care</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/22">Massachusetts</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:08:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Thompson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21980 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mass. Health Care Reform One-Year Later: Clear Successes and Challenges Emerge</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/21920</link>
 <description>One year after implementation, Massachusetts new health care law has
dramatically reduced its rate of the uninsured by half, increasing
coverage in both the public and private sectors for 355,000 previously
uninsured residents, a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=52498&quot; id=&quot;gonz&quot; title=&quot;Urban Institute study&quot;&gt;Urban Institute study&lt;/a&gt; published in &lt;span id=&quot;wyhn2&quot;&gt;&lt;i id=&quot;zz6.0&quot;&gt;Health Affairs&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; shows.  The state has improved access to coverage but rising costs are a key challenge as the state moves forward.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/21920&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1747">Affordable, Quality Health Care for All</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/110">Covering All Kids</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/111">Using Medicaid and SCHIP to Cover Adults</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1752">Improve Access to Private Coverage</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/107">Strengthen Employer Responsibility for Health Care</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1753">Funding Health Care Expansions</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/22">Massachusetts</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Thompson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21920 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Health-Care-for-All On the Installment Plan</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/786/health-care-for-all-on-the-installment-plan</link>
 <description>Incremental steps to improve the health care system can lay the
foundation for comprehensive reform that provides health care for all.
Comprehensive reforms enacted in &lt;b&gt;Massachusetts&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;b&gt;Vermont&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;b&gt;Maine &lt;/b&gt;and San Francisco were, in large part, the result of pragmatic incremental steps those states had already taken. For example, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.familiesusa.org/assets/pdfs/state-expansions-ma.pdf&quot;&gt;Families USA&lt;/a&gt; report discusses the many reforms Massachusetts put in place over the years that led to its comprehensive 2006 reform. &lt;span style=&quot;background-color: #ffffff&quot;&gt;Not every state is as far along in moving comprehensive health care reform, &lt;/span&gt;but
each state does have numerous options for increasing access to
coverage, reducing the growth of health care costs, and improving the
quality of care.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/786/health-care-for-all-on-the-installment-plan&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1757">Rein in Abusive Drug Industry Marketing Practices</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1758">Ensure Drug Quality and Safety – “Academic Detailing”</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1744">Create Incentives for Better Quality Care</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1754">Expand Access to Coverage</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1759">Favor Equally Effective Drugs that are Less Expensive</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1755">Improve Health Providers Cultural Competency</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1745">Improve Public Health</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/108">Strategies to Extend Coverage to Uninsured</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/110">Covering All Kids</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/113">Reducing Prescription Drug Costs</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1760">Strengthen Negotiating Power with Drug Makers</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1756">Support the Health Care Infrastructure and Improve Long-Term Planning</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1746">Eliminate Health Disparities</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/114">Health Insurance Regulations to Ensure Fairness and Access</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/111">Using Medicaid and SCHIP to Cover Adults</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1752">Improve Access to Private Coverage</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/107">Strengthen Employer Responsibility for Health Care</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1761">Increase Prescription Drugs Access for Low-Income Populations</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1753">Funding Health Care Expansions</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1830">Block Rightwing Strategies to Undermine Health Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21861 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
