<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/policy/issue/147/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Eye on the Right: Adding Anti-Gay Provision to Wasteful Film Tax Credits in Florida</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/24709</link>
 <description>PSN has noted in previous Dispatches, these credits are costly, favor out-of-state workers, offer minimal to no returns, do not create permanent jobs,
and place an excessive burden on taxpayers in a time of economic
uncertainty.  The Massachusetts Department of Revenue recently
determined that in twelve states that administer a film tax credit, the
return is extremely meager-- finding that states were only getting back &amp;quot;$.0.07 to $.0.28 per dollar of tax credit granted.&amp;quot;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/24709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/147">Fix Failed Tax Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/10">Florida</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24709 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Revenue Options in 2010: Making the Case and Debunking the Myths</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/24497</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last Tuesday, Oregonians overwhelmingly approved
two ballot initiatives that ratified legislative action last year to
increase high-end personal income and corporate taxes.  The failure of the anti-tax movement in Oregon
is one more in a long stream of right-wing initiatives
rejected by voters at the ballot box.  In fact, progressive revenue
generation as part of a balanced approach to addressing state deficits
has been popular with both voters and legislatures for years.  This &lt;i&gt;Dispatch&lt;/i&gt;
will provide both the facts and messages to debunk opposition to smart
revenue options, while outlining a few of the best revenue approaches
to filling budget holes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/24497&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/150">Promote Fair Income and Estate Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1777">Broaden Sales Taxes to Include Services</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1838">Earned Income Tax Credit</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/146">Make Tax Systems More Progressive</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/153">Review and Sunset Tax Expenditures</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/149">Tax Disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1780">Stop Tax Subsidy Bidding Wars</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24497 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Wake of Scandals, Lawmakers Seek to Limit Film Tax Credits</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23738</link>
 <description>Two weeks ago, both the Director and Deputy Director of the Iowa
Department of Economic Development (IDED), Mike Tramontina and Vince
Lintz, resigned abruptly, and the manager of the Iowa Film Office, Tom Wheeler, was forced to step down following allegations of corruption and abuse of public funds. Specifically, an internal IDED audit discovered issues with the state’s film tax credit including improper oversight,
the purchase of luxury vehicles unnecessary for the completion of
films, and filmmakers claiming payments for multiple production jobs.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23738&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/147">Fix Failed Tax Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/8">Connecticut</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/16">Iowa</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/22">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/23">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/50">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:36:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23738 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Assuring Accountability and Equity in Recovery Spending</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23147</link>
 <description>In this &lt;i&gt;Dispatch&lt;/i&gt;, we emphasize that any stimulus spending has to be tied to increased
accountability and transparency in spending decisions, especially by
government contractors who often operate like a shadow government with
little oversight.  One key reality is that those most in need often don&#039;t receive help from
government spending without transparency and accountability measures
built into the rules.  While the recent federal recovery plan made real
strides in expanding such accountability, additional measures are still
needed if the recovery plan is going to deliver real equity in our
economic recovery.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23147&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1829">Improve Aid to the Poor</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/156">Measure and Disclose the Costs of Public Contracts</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/86">Use Government Contracts to Raise Wage Levels</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/193">Quality K-12 Education</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/157">Strenthen Contractor Accountability</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1816">Transit Equity Funding</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/158">Enforce Wage Standards on Contractors</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:20:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23147 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Report: Stop Retailers Pocketing over $1 Billion in Sales Tax Revenue</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22473</link>
 <description>According to a new study by Good Jobs First, state and local governments lost over $1billion in sales tax revenue
last year as a result of laws that allow retailers to retain a
percentage of the sales tax they collect.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22473&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1779">Better Enforcement of Tax Law</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/7">Colorado</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/14">Illinois</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/39">Pennsylvania</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/44">Texas</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:30:27 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22473 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dos and Dont&#039;s of Coping With State Budget Crises</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/775/dos-and-dont-s-of-coping-with-state-budget-crises</link>
 <description>The budget news is grim in some states.  Twenty states face a combined
budget shortfall of at least $35 billion for 2009, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbpp.org/1-15-08sfp.htm&quot;&gt;analysis by the Center on Budget Policy &amp;amp; Priorities&lt;/a&gt; (see CBPP graph below). Another 8 states will likely have budget problems next year or the year after.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/775/dos-and-dont-s-of-coping-with-state-budget-crises&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/150">Promote Fair Income and Estate Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/151">Reform Property Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1777">Broaden Sales Taxes to Include Services</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1779">Better Enforcement of Tax Law</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/153">Review and Sunset Tax Expenditures</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/149">Tax Disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/147">Fix Failed Tax Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/68">Tax and Budget Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/155">Enforce Job Quality and Public Benefit Standards on Subsidy Recipients</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1780">Stop Tax Subsidy Bidding Wars</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:40:14 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21849 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ranking the States on Online Disclosure of Govt Contracts, Subsidies and Lobbying</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/717/ranking-the-states-on-online-disclosure-of-govt-contracts-subsidies-and-lobbying</link>
 <description>In the age of Google, citizens expect to be able to find core
information on the Internet about government operations, but as a major
new report being released today highlights, most states are failing on
public transparency.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/717/ranking-the-states-on-online-disclosure-of-govt-contracts-subsidies-and-lobbying&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/133">Disclosure and Oversight</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/156">Measure and Disclose the Costs of Public Contracts</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/157">Strenthen Contractor Accountability</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1">All 50 States</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/2">Alabama</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/8">Connecticut</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/15">Indiana</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/28">Nebraska</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/30">New Hampshire</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/31">New Jersey</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/33">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/41">South Carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/51">Wyoming</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:44:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21797 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Economic Subsidy Recipients Who Fail on Job Promises to be Held Accountable in NY</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/647/economic-subsidy-recipients-who-fail-on-job-promises-to-be-held-accountable-in-ny</link>
 <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;State creates economic development program to
encourage business investment in the state. State hands out billions in
economic subsidies. State finds out many companies have taken the cash and
failed to deliver on promised
jobs.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/647/economic-subsidy-recipients-who-fail-on-job-promises-to-be-held-accountable-in-ny&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/155">Enforce Job Quality and Public Benefit Standards on Subsidy Recipients</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 05:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21736 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Target&#039;s Tax Subsidies Under Scrutiny After Chicago Living Wage Fight</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/379/target-s-tax-subsidies-under-scrutiny-after-chicago-living-wage-fight</link>
 <description>Target management apparently didn&#039;t get the memo. Faced with stagnating
wages and increasing inequality, American workers and taxpayers are
waking up to the big box gambit where irresponsible employers subsidize
their low wages through favorable tax packages. When Target threatened
to stop opening new stores in &lt;b&gt;Chicago&lt;/b&gt; if the Windy City gave final approval to its ordinance requiring a living wage for retail workers (see this &lt;a href=&quot;/content/347/groundbreaking-living-wage-victory-for-chicago-retail-workers&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dispatch&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
for more details), it opened up a new debate over why cities are
offering low-wage retail stores tax subsidies in the first place. As a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/pdf/TIF_dollars_to_Target_analysis.pdf&quot;&gt;new report&lt;/a&gt;
produced by the Neighborhood Capital Budget Group documents, Target
received $9.9 million in tax-increment financing (TIF) to subsidize its
existing stores in Chicago.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/379/target-s-tax-subsidies-under-scrutiny-after-chicago-living-wage-fight&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/153">Review and Sunset Tax Expenditures</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/155">Enforce Job Quality and Public Benefit Standards on Subsidy Recipients</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:56:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21508 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Supremes May Undercut State Tax Powers</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/21390</link>
 <description>State governments offer businesses tens of billions in tax incentives
each year to invest in their states-- corporate subsidies that many
advocates see as wasteful giveways &lt;http:&gt; but that others see as a lifeline for their communities.&lt;/http:&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/21390&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/163">Federal Preemption Must Be Explicit</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/155">Enforce Job Quality and Public Benefit Standards on Subsidy Recipients</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/36">Ohio</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 08:26:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21390 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
