<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/policy/issue/1738/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>State Policymakers Need to Respond to Growing Clout of Latino Voters Nationwide</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/24591</link>
 <description>A recent report from the advocacy group America’s Voice
highlighted the growing power of Latino voters in the upcoming 2010
elections.  Latino voters played a critical role in 2008 to propel
President Obama to victory in several key swing states that previously
trended Republican, including Virginia.  Latino voter
registration and turnout rates have exploded over the past few years:
roughly 10 million voted in the 2008 Presidential election alone, a 2.5
million increase from 2004 and 4 million person increase since 2000. 
Latino voter registration grew by over 54% between 2000 and 2008, and
turnout grew 64% over the same time period.  
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/24591&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1794">Expand Access to Adult English Classes</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/140">Mail-in and Early Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/138">Election Day Registration</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/132">Make Every Vote Count</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1803">Provide Health Care for Immigrant Communities</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:19:43 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Suman Raghunathan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24591 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>9th Circuit Strikes Down Washington&#039;s Felon Voting Law</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/24412</link>
 <description>Last week the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of disenfranchised felons in Washington, holding in a summary judgment order
that the state&#039;s practice of denying the vote to felons violates the
federal Voting Rights Act (VRA).  Notably, instead of basing their
argument on the nature of the felon disenfranchisement law at issue,
the case centered on the interaction between felon disenfranchisement
and the discrimination in the criminal justice system itself.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/24412&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1735">National Voter Registration Act Compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/145">Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/47">Virginia</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/48">Washington</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/50">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:50:19 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24412 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Voter ID Law Struck Down by Indiana Appellate Court</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23692</link>
 <description>Last week the Indiana Court of Appeals struck down the photo identification requirement for voting that was upheld by the US Supreme Court in its &lt;i&gt;Crawford&lt;/i&gt; decision
last year.  In doing so, the court ruled on the basis of equal
protection as guaranteed by Indiana&#039;s state constitution, which is more
extensive than federal law.  The Indiana court follows Missouri, whose photo ID requirement was found unconstitutional under that state&#039;s constitution in 2006.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23692&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/15">Indiana</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:14:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23692 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Path Breaking Voter Registration Modernization Bill is Vetoed by Minnesota Governor Pawlenty</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23135</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Minnesota legislators passed a landmark voter registration modernization bill
recently that would, absent a veto, have registered or updated the
registration of voters automatically when they applied for a driver&#039;s
license, learner&#039;s permit or ID card.  It would also use information in
motor vehicle and corrections databases to verify and maintain voter
rolls.  This legislation, sponsored by Rep. Steve Simon and Sen. John Marty,
would have made Minnesota the first state in the nation to proactively
register voters, and made it among the most advanced in maintaining
clean, accurate voter rolls.  The bill was designed to build on the
state&#039;s already first-in-the-nation portability bill, which requires automatic updates to voter registrations based on changes of address.
&lt;/p&gt;
However, Governor Pawlenty vetoed this historic legislation last week...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23135&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1733">Improving Voter List Maintenance</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1734">Voter Registration Modernization</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1735">National Voter Registration Act Compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/67">Clean and Fair Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/145">Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/24">Minnesota</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:18:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23135 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Georgia Becomes 2nd State to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23089</link>
 <description>Following Arizona&#039;s lead, Georgia has passed a law
requiring that all residents prove their citizenship before they can
register to vote.  This is the most restrictive form of voter ID yet,
and it is far more restrictive than the photo ID requirements that have
been passed across the country.  It has been enacted even though there
is no indication that non-citizen voting is a problem in the state; in
fact, Georgia election officials are confident that the current photo ID requirement is strict enough to prevent any problems from arising.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23089&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/11">Georgia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:59:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23089 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Florida Rightwing Attempts to Suppress Voting Rights with Election Restrictions</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23015</link>
 <description>Just weeks before the end of the legislative session, rightwing lawmakers in Florida
are advancing omnibus legislation that progressive voting rights
advocates and legislators see as yet another scheme to reduce voter
turnout and manipulate election rules to the benefit of conservatives. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23015&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1738">Resist Vote Suppression by Right-Wing</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/10">Florida</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:57:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23015 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>E-verify: An Economic Burden to Businesses and State Budgets</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22764</link>
 <description>A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/ircaempverif/e-verify-facts-2009-01-29.pdf&quot; title=&quot;new resource&quot;&gt;new resource&lt;/a&gt;
from our friends at the National Immigration Law Center emphasizes the
costs to both businesses and local governments of trying to enforce
immigration law in the workplace.  As they note, the E-verify system -
the electronic program that is currently voluntary for employers to use
in comparing workers’ documents for employment eligibility against
federal databases from the Department of Homeland Security and the
Social Security Administration - imposes a range of costs:
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22764&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1782">Integrating Immigrants into Our Communities</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:09:14 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Caroline Fan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22764 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Voter ID: The Landscape for 2009</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22601</link>
 <description>As we &lt;a href=&quot;/node/22515&quot;&gt;noted in the &lt;i&gt;Dispatch&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; a couple weeks ago, despite a dearth of recent successes and mounting fiscal crises in most states, rightwing &lt;a href=&quot;/policy/issue/142&quot;&gt;voter ID&lt;/a&gt; legislation designed to suppress voter turnout continues to be pressed around the country.  So far this year at least 17 states have seen bills introduced to institute or enhance ID requirements for voting or registration (AL, CO, GA, IN, MD, MN, MS, MO, NY, OK, RI, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, WY).  It appears we now know enough to predict the landscape of the voter ID battles in this legislative session.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22601&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/2">Alabama</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/7">Colorado</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/11">Georgia</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/24">Minnesota</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/25">Mississippi</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/37">Oklahoma</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/41">South Carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/43">Tennessee</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/44">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/51">Wyoming</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:51:31 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22601 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Battles Over Voter ID Requirements Loom Large in 2009 Sessions</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22515</link>
 <description>Last year we saw the incredible wave of voter ID legislation promoted
nationwide by rightwing activists seem to peter out. High profile
campaigns for restrictive photo ID and proof-of-citizenship
requirements, which limit the voting of many legal citizens (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.votingtechnologyproject.org/media/documents/wps/vtp_wp57b.pdf&quot; title=&quot;here&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://brennan.3cdn.net/63836ceea55aa81e4f_hlm6bhkse.pdf&quot; title=&quot;here&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), were met with defeat. But the proponents of voter ID have apparently not been deterred. The good people at &lt;a href=&quot;http://projectvote.org/&quot;&gt;Project Vote&lt;/a&gt;,
who have been monitoring voter ID legislation across the country, are
finding that rightwing lawmakers in key states continue to &lt;a href=&quot;http://projectvote.org/index.php?id=265&amp;amp;tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=2831&amp;amp;tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=263&amp;amp;cHash=d4af484a43&quot;&gt;place voter ID at the top of their to-do list&lt;/a&gt;.
This is despite the passing of another election without any evidence
of the type of fraud that voter ID requirements would help prevent -
someone attempting to register and vote twice in the same state.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22515&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1738">Resist Vote Suppression by Right-Wing</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:49:22 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22515 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Battles Over Voter ID Requirements Loom Large in 2009 Sessions</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23057</link>
 <description>Last year we saw the incredible wave of voter ID legislation promoted
nationwide by rightwing activists seem to peter out. High profile
campaigns for restrictive photo ID and proof-of-citizenship
requirements, which limit the voting of many legal citizens  were met with defeat. But the proponents of voter ID have apparently not been deterred. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23057&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/142">Oppose Restrictive ID Laws</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/44">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/47">Virginia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Caroline Fan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23057 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
