<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/policy/issue/57/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Banks Take Advantage of States in Fiscal Crisis</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/24659</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The same large banks whose unregulated actions
were primary contributors to the economic downturn have also been
manipulating state and local governments to profit from budget deficits
for years.  Essentially, banks are alluring states with
the promise of a means to cut borrowing costs and increase returns
through the use of an interest rate swap.  The mechanism is a
derivative that allows cash-strapped municipalities and states to
exchange interest payments on a variable bond deal for an allocation of
funds from a bank.  So, the bank would establish a fixed rate on the
bond and swap
for the variable &amp;quot;interest rate of the bond that was set by larger
macroeconomic forces, such as the Federal Reserve.&amp;quot;  Unfortunately, the
results have been disastrous.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/24659&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/57">Consumer Protection &amp;amp; Corporate Accountability</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:13:02 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24659 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Foreclosure and Anti-Predatory Lending Reforms</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/24191</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
There will be 2.4 million foreclosures in 
2009 along with 9 million foreclosures between 2009-2012, according to the Center 
for Responsible Lending (CRL).  CRL also estimates that 69 million homes will lose property value because of nearby 
foreclosures for a total property value loss of $502 billion.  As part of our Multi-State Shared Agenda, 
the Progressive States Network is working with its partners and leading experts 
to promote reforms to stem the foreclosure crisis and put in place reforms to 
discourage predatory lending practices in the future.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/24191&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/117">End Predatory Lending</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1849">Foreclosure and Predatory Lending Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:54:08 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Julie Bero</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24191 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Compromise  Preserves State Power to Protect Consumers from Abuses by National Banks in Proposed U.S. House Bill</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23847</link>
 <description>Yesterday, the U.S. House Banking Committee defeated amendments that
would have gutted provisions in law to restore state powers to protect
consumers of national banks.  Instead, the Committee approved  compromise language
that, while not as expansive in the protection of state legislation as
the Obama administration had urged, is still a significant victory
overall against large financial interests.  By a vote of 29-38, the
committee defeated a proposed amendment by Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-&lt;b&gt;Texas&lt;/b&gt;) that would  have preempted all state regulation of national financial institutions.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23847&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/117">End Predatory Lending</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/163">Federal Preemption Must Be Explicit</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:31:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23847 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Food Policy and Security: from Farm to Table and Classroom</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23788</link>
 <description>Even as Congress debates increased funding for the federal food stamps program and nutrition aid, this Dispatch will
outline the steps states are taking on a wide array of policies that
impact working families in urban centers and on rural farms, from food
safety and regulation to access to local foods to improving health and
nutrition in our communities.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23788&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1826">Food and Retail Regulation</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:16:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Caroline Fan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23788 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Protecting State Consumer Protection from Preemption in Federal Financial Reform</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23527</link>
 <description>The context of this call is that, in the wake of the financial meltdown
that engulfed the country last year largely caused by fraud and
predatory lending, Congress is now debating the Consumer Financial
Protection Agency Act (CFPA Act, H 3126).
The act would create a consumer product protection agency for
financial products analogous to the Consumer Product Safety Board. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23527&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/117">End Predatory Lending</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/163">Federal Preemption Must Be Explicit</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:22:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23527 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Protecting the Unemployed from Abusive Credit Inquiries</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23371</link>
 <description>As the economic downturn progresses, American workers are facing a
disturbing rise in employers using credit ratings to determine job
worthiness.  According to a 2006 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management,
the number of firms using credit histories to screen applicants rose
from 25% in 1998 to 43% despite such inquiries often being
discriminatory and even illegal.  
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23371&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1835">Stop Race Discrimination</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/61">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/57">Consumer Protection &amp;amp; Corporate Accountability</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/75">Pension Protection &amp;amp; Asset Accumulation</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1837">Privacy Protection</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/6">California</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/8">Connecticut</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/12">Hawaii</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/15">Indiana</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/23">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/33">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/36">Ohio</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/44">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/48">Washington</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:40:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Caroline Fan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23371 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Trade and the States: Promoting Collaboration on Negotiating and Implementing Trade Deals</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23323</link>
 <description>This &lt;i&gt;Dispatch &lt;/i&gt;will highlight many of the rising concerns by
state leaders over recent federal trade deals, how states have been
taking action to increase their roles in the trade negotiation process,
and recent mobilization by those state leaders working with federal
allies to institutionalize the role of states in the trade negotiation
and implementation process.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23323&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/78">Fair Trade Deals</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:03:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23323 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Supreme Court and the States: Trend Defending State Authority Emerges this Term</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23296</link>
 <description>Whether out of circumstance or an emerging trend, where state authority
was at issue, this term the U.S. Supreme Court overwhelmingly deferred
to state decision makers-- a significant reveral from last year.  
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23296&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1758">Ensure Drug Quality and Safety – “Academic Detailing”</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/61">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/117">End Predatory Lending</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/170">Rights of Defendants</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/173">Stop Police Abuses</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/168">Redistricting Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/69">Progressive Federalism</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1837">Privacy Protection</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:41:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23296 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Some States Wasting Money on Job Bidding Wars and Corporate Subsidies</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23283</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Overall, federal recovery spending is working as intended, helping states provide needed services and avoid layoffs that would be worsening unemployment rates.  The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
estimates that these funds are providing states with 40 percent of what
is needed to help their budgets in balance over the next few fiscal
years.  The recovery plan has provided states with flexibility in
addressing key programs and priorities. Unfortunately, a number of states have wasted budget funds on trying to steal jobs from one another, as highlighted by Good Jobs First. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23283&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/57">Consumer Protection &amp;amp; Corporate Accountability</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/11">Georgia</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/18">Kentucky</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/31">New Jersey</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:21:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23283 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Buy American and Fair Trade Policies to Spur National and Global Economic Recovery</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23027</link>
 <description>As this Dispatch will outline, Buy American policies are a first step in promoting an alternative to the trade and deregulation policies that fueled the current economic crisis.  Ultimately, we need policies that strengthen local tools for economic growth at home, combined with fair trade policies to raise wage standards abroad as well.   Also, as corporate interests increasingly use trade agreements to restrict state authority to protect worker, consumer and environmental interests, states are increasingly reviewing those trade agreements in order to restore states&#039; ability to effectively respond to economic crises and protect the long-term interests of working families. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23027&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/78">Fair Trade Deals</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/223">Physical Infrastructure Investments</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/148">Reform Government Contracts and Restrict Privatization</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:53:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23027 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
