Overview

Oct 24 2008

Americans are demanding democratic reform after the string of government scandals, election day disasters and questionable results that have plagued our elections since 2000.  With polls showing that the majority of Americans little or no trust in government, progressive state leaders are realizing that we can no longer ignore or tolerate the significant democracy deficit that undermines our ability to meet our challenges in all areas of progressive reform.

Voters want leaders who stand up to monied interests.  Candidates dependent on corporate benefactors can’t fully serve their constituents and invariably become hostages to or outright defenders of a dysfunctional status quo.  Voters are frustrated that on issues ranging from healthcare to education to transportation to energy, the changes we need are stymied by a political system soaked in corporate cash. Progressive leaders can distinguish themselves, not just by rising above the political swamp to secure good policies for their constituents, but also by actively working to drain the swamp of corporate lobbying and campaign contributions so that the political process functions fairly and without favor.

Election reforms also support the broader progressive policy agenda.   One of the largest impediments to real progressive reform is that our election system often excludes voters – non-white, less-educated, and less wealthy individuals – who are the most supportive of progressive policy changes.  Expanding electoral participation to include a larger, more diverse set of voters will increase support for the host of progressive reforms that are supported by the substantial majority of the population, but whose voices are not always heard at the ballot box.  Working state by state to remove barriers to voting and increase participation in the political process will be a fundamental determinant of how successful progressives will be in achieving the broader reforms we are working toward.

Voters are clearly eager for change.  We have arrived at a moment where the need to invigorate our democracy and establish clear accountability has become overwhelmingly obvious to a large number of Americans.  Americans' demands for change in the face of the epic failures of rightwing policy are ushering in a new progressive era in our nation.  How far this transition goes and how long it lasts will be determined in large part by how well progressives use this opportunity to expand the vote.  However, progressive leaders need to be vigilant in fighting off right wing attempts to erode the right to vote, since we are seeing renewed efforts to undermine voter rights and suppress turnout through new barriers to voting and outright intimidation.

Progressive States Network’s Clean and Fair Elections Program:  This policy guide presents a series of election and governance reforms that are essential to both invigorating our democracy and achieving other progressive goals.    

From the Dispatch

Georgia's Draconian Voter Verification System Passes Federal Muster

Aug 26 2010

Two years of courtroom battles ended on Monday as Georgia received a green light from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) to go ahead with its controversial voter verification system, a major step backward for the state.

Connecticut Defends Clean Elections Financing Program

Aug 19 2010

Overriding a veto by their Governor, the Conneticut Legislature has strengthened its Citizen's Election system of public financing of elections that was first instituted in 2005. Responding to a bad decision by a federal appeals court, the Legislature has fixed the system and increased the public financing available to candidates.

All-Mail Voting Is One Winner of Colorado's Primary

Aug 12 2010

As pundits attempt to digest what Colorado's primary on Tuesday night means for incumbents and insurgents alike, there is one thing everyone can agree on: voting by mail saved counties much-needed money while boosting turnout.

New York: One Signature Away from Ending Prison-Based Gerrymandering

Aug 12 2010

Legislation to end the practice of prison-based gerrymandering in New York, included within the 2011 state budget, passed both the Senate and Assembly last week. Once Gov. Patterson approves the budget package, the bill will go into effect in time for next year's redistricting efforts.

Anti-immigrant Proposals Continue to Fail in Wake of Arizona’s Law

Jul 26 2010

As this Dispatch will detail, after considerable media hype about Arizona-style bills sweeping across the nation, the reality is that from from Nevada to Arkansas to Massachusetts to Kansas and Rhode Island, anti-immigrant bills and ballot initiatives largely didn't move or failed to make this fall's ballot.  A key reason:  most state leaders and police chiefs recognize that requiring local governments to assume immigration enforcement responsibilities from the federal government will distract them from fighting violent crime and undermine trust with local residents that are essential to successful community policing.

National Popular Vote Victory in Massachusetts

Jul 22 2010

National Popular Vote Victory in Massachusetts Adds Momentum to Changing Presidential Vote System

Last week, the Massachusetts Senate passed National Popular Vote (NPV) legislation by a 28-10 vote, a little more than a month after the state’s House of Representatives approved NPV by an overwhelmingly bipartisan majority.

Delaware Becomes 2nd State to End Prison-Based Gerrymandering

Jul 08 2010

Last week, Delaware became the second state in the country to pass legislation that would adjust US Census data to count incarcerated people as residents of their home addresses for redistricting purposes.  It is currently waiting for Gov. Jack Markell’s signature.

Indiana Supreme Court Upholds Restrictive Voter ID Law

Jul 01 2010

In a disappointing turn of events, Indiana’s Supreme Court ruled 4-1 in favor of the state’s voter ID law, overturning last year’s decision by the Indiana Court of Appeals that deemed voter ID requirements unconstitutional partly because it treated those casting absentee ballots differently from those at voting booths.  But in the end, the Indiana Supreme Court majority opinion stated, “It is within the power of the legislature to require voters to identify themselves at the polls using a photo ID.”

Supreme Court 2009-2010: Pro-Corporate, But Continued Trend Towards Deferral to State Authority

Jun 29 2010

Yesterday, the Supreme Court ended its term with a bang with a ruling in McDonald v.

National Popular Vote Approved in Chambers in New York and Massachusetts

Jun 10 2010

On June 7, the New York Senate passed S2286A, the National Popular Vote (NPV) bill, with over two-thirds of both political parties supporting the bill in a 52-7 roll call.  Although it has received bipartisan support ever since it was first introduced in 2006, the overwhelmingly bipartisan support it received during Monday's vote was unprecedented.  Twenty-two of the Chamber's 30 Republicans voted for the bill, not far off from the 79% overall support in New York for a national popular vote for President.  
Add a Resource - have a link to suggest?
Fill out the form and hit 'Submit' to add a new Clean and Fair Elections resource. All submissions go through an approval process.

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:
Sign up for the Stateside Dispatch, PSN’s twice-weekly roundup of the most important issues moving through the states, including what is happening in your state.