PSN Works with State Legislators and advocates in supporting effective legislative campaigns to promote policy change state by state Read more about how PSN can support you
Overview
Oct 24 2008
Americans are demanding democratic reform after the string of government scandals, election day disasters and questionable results that have plagued our elections since 2000. With polls showing that the majority of Americans little or no trust in government, progressive state leaders are realizing that we can no longer ignore or tolerate the significant democracy deficit that undermines our ability to meet our challenges in all areas of progressive reform.
Voters want leaders who stand up to monied interests. Candidates dependent on corporate benefactors can’t fully serve their constituents and invariably become hostages to or outright defenders of a dysfunctional status quo. Voters are frustrated that on issues ranging from healthcare to education to transportation to energy, the changes we need are stymied by a political system soaked in corporate cash. Progressive leaders can distinguish themselves, not just by rising above the political swamp to secure good policies for their constituents, but also by actively working to drain the swamp of corporate lobbying and campaign contributions so that the political process functions fairly and without favor.
Election reforms also support the broader progressive policy agenda. One of the largest impediments to real progressive reform is that our election system often excludes voters – non-white, less-educated, and less wealthy individuals – who are the most supportive of progressive policy changes. Expanding electoral participation to include a larger, more diverse set of voters will increase support for the host of progressive reforms that are supported by the substantial majority of the population, but whose voices are not always heard at the ballot box. Working state by state to remove barriers to voting and increase participation in the political process will be a fundamental determinant of how successful progressives will be in achieving the broader reforms we are working toward.
Voters are clearly eager for change. We have arrived at a moment where the need to invigorate our democracy and establish clear accountability has become overwhelmingly obvious to a large number of Americans. Americans' demands for change in the face of the epic failures of rightwing policy are ushering in a new progressive era in our nation. How far this transition goes and how long it lasts will be determined in large part by how well progressives use this opportunity to expand the vote. However, progressive leaders need to be vigilant in fighting off right wing attempts to erode the right to vote, since we are seeing renewed efforts to undermine voter rights and suppress turnout through new barriers to voting and outright intimidation.
Progressive States Network’s Clean and Fair Elections Program: This policy guide presents a series of election and governance reforms that are essential to both invigorating our democracy and achieving other progressive goals.
- Reducing the Influence of Money over our Democracy: Reform begins with policies such as public campaign finance that will help clean up government and reduce the influence of corporations and monied interests over our democracy.
- Growing the Electorate: The next steps are changes to our election systems such as ensuring compliance with the National Voter Registration Act, modernizing voter registration and establishing same day registration, all of which would increase participation, especially among groups that have traditionally been marginalized politically and socially.
- Making Every Vote Count: We must also ensure every vote counts and every voice is heard. This includes both securing the integrity of elections, and making sure that systems aren't rigged to prevent meaningful participation, such as establishing a National Popular Vote for president.
- Resisting Vote Suppression by the Rightwing: Lastly, we need polices that beat back the rightwing's attack on voting. Steps include blocking voter ID laws and protecting voters from intimidation and deception.
This task of invigorating our democracy and achieving the promise of equality and inclusion can only be successful if we simultaneously work to reduce the power of corporations by reforming government and establishing publicly-funded elections. We must also endeavor to secure the right to vote and accommodate the electoral participation of every American. The barriers to those goals are significant, and overcoming them will take the considerable effort of a coalition far larger than the traditional voting rights and “good government” communities, in addition to a wealth of grassroots support. Over the last several years, a formidable and diverse democracy reform movement has been building in this country, and public opinion is clearly on the side of a democratic renewal. Ordinary citizens are energized as they haven't been in a generation. Now is the time to build on that foundation by enlisting as much of the broader progressive movement as possible in these critical efforts.
Supporting the efforts of lawmakers to increase democracy and accountability in government are an extremely able group of advocates and experts whose work is referenced throughout this policy guide.
Leaders
in the democracy reform advocacy and policy development community include:
The
Brennan Center for Justice
Common Cause
Demos
FairVote
Lawyers'
Committee for Civil Rights
League of Women Voters
People for the
American Way
Project Vote
Public Campaign
Voter Action
See also:
- The Pew Center on the States' Make Voting Work initiative provides a wealth of knowledge on election reform and administration.
- The National Conference of State Legislatures has started a program titled Engaging State Legislatures in Election Reform. This program seeks to provide legislators with research and analysis on election reform issues and develop a network of legislators working on these issues.
From The Dispatch
Issue Updates
Core Analysis
-
Clean and Fair Elections: Policy Options for 2009 - Clean and Fair Elections: Policy Options Download a PDF copy of "Clean and Fair Elections: Policy…
-
Representational Bias in the 2008 Electorate - Project Vote - <b><i>Representational Bias in the 2008 Electorate</i></b> reviews the story of who was eligible to vote, who was registered to vote, and who did vote in the 2008 general election. Analyzing the November Voting and Registration supplements of the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey, the report offers detailed information on registration rates and voting behavior based on key demographic factors, including race/ethnicity, age, gender and marital status, income, education, residential mobility, and disability status. The report also provides registration and turnout rates for each state, with comparative rankings.
In the News
-
VA: Senate makes absentee voting easier - Altavista Journal - It would be easier to vote absentee in Virginia under a bill approved by the Senate.<br /> <br /> Senators voted 29-10 in favor of Senate Bill 83, which would allow qualified voters to vote absentee in person without providing an excuse or reason. Under existing law, Virginians must give an excuse, such as illness or work reasons, to cast a ballot before Election Day. "It is unfair to make people who want to vote absentee go through unnecessary hoops," said the bill's chief sponsor, Sen. Janet Howell, D-Reston.
-
Report: Michigan voters wrongly purged from rolls - Michigan Messenger - Thousands of people may have been wrongly removed from the state’s registered voter database due to a botched list management effort undertaken by the Michigan Bureau of Elections under pressure from the Bush administration. <p> Between July 2006 and June 2009, state officials working under Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land conducted an unprecedented centralized and computer-assisted purge of the state’s voter database, according to the nonpartisan voting rights group the Michigan Election Reform Alliance. </p>
-
OR: Voter registration costs detailed - Statesman Journal - <!--Saxotech Paragraph Count: 13<br> -->Oregon spent an average of $4.51 for each of the more than 2 million registered voters in the state in 2008.<span class="aa"></span> <p> <span class="pp"></span>It may not seem like a lot — but it still added up in 2008 to almost $10 million spent by state and county governments, which share responsibility for registering voters and conducting elections.<span class="aa"></span> </p> <span class="pp"></span>Each transaction in 2008, according to a study conducted by the Pew Center on the States, cost $8.43 — whether it was adding a name to the registration rolls or changing an address.
Eye On The Right
-
Eye on the Right: Conservative Computer Security Expert Blows the Whistle on Lack of Ballot Security - Those who have followed the growing controversy over electronic voting machines are well aware that,…
Resource Organizations
-
Brennan Center for Justice - Democracy Program - The Democracy Program collaborates with grassroots groups, advocacy organizations and reform-minded government officials to change the ways in which citizens participate in their government by fixing the systems that discourage voting, hinder competition and promote the interests of the few over the rights of the many. The Center advances these goals using tools of research, policy analysis and publications, media outreach and public education, legislative counseling and advocacy and legal action.
-
Common Cause - Common Cause is a nonpartisan, nonprofit advocacy organization founded in 1970 by John Gardner as a vehicle for citizens to make their voices heard in the political process and to hold their elected leaders accountable to the public interest. Now with nearly 400,000 members and supporters and 36 state organizations, Common Cause remains committed to honest, open and accountable government, as well as encouraging citizen participation in democracy.
