<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/policy/issue/92/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Labor Peace Law in New York Part of Trend of Promoting Labor Rights on Government Projects</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/24707</link>
 <description>On March 1st, a new law in New York
goes into effect, strengthening the freedom of employees to form labor
unions at hotels or convention centers run or funded by state
authorities, a dramatic victory for hotel workers in the state.  The law has specific language
requiring that hotels or convention centers where state public
authorities have a substantial proprietary interest include a &amp;quot;labor
peace agreement&amp;quot; with hotel unions in the state in exchange for the
unions agreeing not to strike for five years.  The law follows a
similar executive order by the Governor approved last year.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/24707&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/94">Extend Union Rights to Additional Employees</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/92">Workplace Speech &amp;amp; Freedom to Form Unions</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/33">New York</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:01:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24707 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Worker Freedom Bill Passed in Oregon to Allow Workers to Avoid Mandatory Political or Religious Meetings in Workplace</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23228</link>
 <description>Too often workers are forced by employers to listen to religious,
political, or anti-union propaganda that has nothing to do with their
work responsibilities-- yet they are threatened with being fired if
they don&#039;t attend such employer-mandated meetings.  The Oregon legislature this past week joined New Jersey in giving employees the right to skip such employer propaganda meetings without fearing reprisals.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23228&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/93">Protect Employees from Free Speech Retaliation</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/38">Oregon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:40:28 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23228 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>State Laws Allowing Majority Sign-up for Unions Show why Employee Free Choice Act is Fair Option for Workers</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/23073</link>
 <description>It seems relatively simple.  The proposed federal Employee Free Choice
Act would give employees the freedom to form a union when a majority of
workers sign cards saying that they want one, avoiding the often months
of employer harassment that have inevitably accompanied traditional
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election processes.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/23073&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/93">Protect Employees from Free Speech Retaliation</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/92">Workplace Speech &amp;amp; Freedom to Form Unions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:31:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23073 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Anti-Union Front Groups Promote Distorted &quot;Save Our Secret Ballots&quot; Initiative Campaigns</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/22565</link>
 <description>With a new administration in Washington, D.C. promising to enact
federal labor law reform for the first time in generations,
corporations are plowing money into the states in an attempt to
undermine workers rights there.  Calling itself the &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sosballot.org/&quot;&gt;Save Our Secret Ballot&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; (SOSB) coalition, this corporate effort is looking to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seiu.org/2009/01/yet-another-corporate-front-group-save-our-secret-ballots.php&quot;&gt;amend the state constitutions&lt;/a&gt;
of Arizona, Arkansas, Missouri, Nevada and Utah to block workers from
choosing majority sign-up rules to form unions -- a clear attempt to
thwart implementation of the proposed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/majoritysignup.cfm&quot;&gt;Employee Free Choice Act&lt;/a&gt;
which if enacted would give employees the choice of traditional
elections run by the federal government or signing authorization cards
by a majority of employees.  
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/22565&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/92">Workplace Speech &amp;amp; Freedom to Form Unions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:23:24 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22565 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Mediated Elections&quot; Process for Farmworkers Moving Forward in California</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/21963</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Reacting to a spate of recent farmworker deaths, both houses of the
California legislature have approved a new &amp;quot;mediated election&amp;quot; process
for farmworker unions.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2351-2400/ab_2386_bill_20080402_amended_asm_v98.pdf&quot; title=&quot;AB 2386&quot;&gt;AB 2386&lt;/a&gt; will strengthen farmworkers abilities to form labor unions and address workplace conditions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Six farmworkers have died this summer of
suspected heat illness and 15 have died since 2003 despite requirements
adopted in 2005 that employers provide minimum heat illness
safeguards.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2351-2400/ab_2386_bill_20080402_amended_asm_v98.pdf&quot; title=&quot;AB 2386&quot;&gt;AB 2386&lt;/a&gt;, sponsored by &lt;a href=&quot;http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a46/default.aspx&quot; title=&quot;Speaker Emeritus NuÅˆez&quot;&gt;Speaker Emeritus Nunez&lt;/a&gt;,
proposes a new process that allows farmworkers to quickly vote by mail
with two choices on the ballot to directly vote for the union on
the ballot or to vote for a more traditional union election later, with
the whole process overseen by a mediator jointly chosen by the union
and the employer. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/21963&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/94">Extend Union Rights to Additional Employees</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/6">California</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21963 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Protecting Worker Freedom from Mandatory Meetings</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/21862</link>
 <description>Workers often face a no-win situation: they are forced into
employer-sponsored meetings where they are harangued with the
employer&#039;s political views or anti-union propaganda and, if they
actually speak out with their own opinions, they get punished or even
fired.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/21862&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/93">Protect Employees from Free Speech Retaliation</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:21:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21862 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California Upholds Free Speech Access to Malls for Labor Boycotts</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/743/california-upholds-free-speech-access-to-malls-for-labor-boycotts</link>
 <description>On December 24th, the California Supreme Court gave a major Christmas
present for labor rights, affirming that under California law, union
members in a mall could distribute handbills calling for a consumer
boycott of one of the mall&#039;s tenants. The decision, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S144753.PDF&quot;&gt;Fashion Valley Mall v. NLRB&lt;/a&gt;, built
on an earlier state high court decision in 1980 that deemed malls to be
a &amp;quot;public forum&amp;quot; where the public had free speech rights. The recent
decision extended that principle to active labor boycotts -- a critical
tool for labor to get its message out to consumers.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/743/california-upholds-free-speech-access-to-malls-for-labor-boycotts&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/95">Increase Free Speech Access to Employer Property</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/6">California</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/8">Connecticut</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/22">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/31">New Jersey</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/39">Pennsylvania</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21819 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Exploited &quot;Independent Contractor&quot; Truckers Drive Pollution in Our Ports</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/690/how-exploited-independent-contractor-truckers-drive-pollution-in-our-ports</link>
 <description>It&#039;s well-known that deregulation of the trucking industry has led to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Sweatshops-Wheels-Winners-Trucking-Deregulation/dp/0195128869&quot;&gt;worse
working conditions&lt;/a&gt; in the industry and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/2006/12/safety_lost_with_lax_trucking.html&quot;&gt;lower
safety standards on the road&lt;/a&gt;. But new coalitions are focusing on the way
conditions in the trucking industry contribute to pollution that chokes
trucking hubs like our ports.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/690/how-exploited-independent-contractor-truckers-drive-pollution-in-our-ports&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1815">Green Collar Workforce Development</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/94">Extend Union Rights to Additional Employees</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/87">Leverage Economic Development Funds and Leases</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/88">Create Wage Standards in Specific Industries</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:07:44 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21773 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Labor Day: How States Can Protect Workers Rights</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/666/labor-day-how-states-can-protect-workers-rights</link>
 <description>In honor of Labor Day, we thought we would highlight some of our past
&lt;i&gt;Dispatches&lt;/i&gt; which outline steps states can take to protect workers&#039;
rights and raise wage standards. With new Census data
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbpp.org/8-28-07pov.htm&quot;&gt;showing&lt;/a&gt; that the median
income for working-age households is still $1,300 below 2001 when the last
recession hit bottom, the need for states to act to improve working conditions
is greater than ever.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/666/labor-day-how-states-can-protect-workers-rights&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/89">Increase Penalties for Wage Law Violations</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/93">Protect Employees from Free Speech Retaliation</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/52">Rewarding Work</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/86">Use Government Contracts to Raise Wage Levels</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/84">Wage Standards</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/77">Wage Standards and Workplace Freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/94">Extend Union Rights to Additional Employees</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/85">Wage Law Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/92">Workplace Speech &amp;amp; Freedom to Form Unions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:43:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21750 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Labor Union Majority Signup Approved in OR &amp; NH -- And States Demand the US Senate Follows Suit</title>
 <link>http://progressivestates.org/node/622/labor-union-majority-signup-approved-in-or-nh----and-states-demand-the-us-senate-follows-suit-</link>
 <description>This
week, the &lt;b&gt;Oregon&lt;/b&gt; Senate voted to strengthen the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/06/12/oregon-set-to-ensure-freedom-to-form-unions-for-public-employees/&quot;&gt;freedom
of state public employees to form unions&lt;/a&gt;, joining the Oregon House in
approving a bill,
&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://landru.leg.state.or.us/07reg/measures/hb2800.dir/hb2891.1sa.html&quot;&gt;HB
2891&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, to simplify the organizing proces by having the state
government recognize a union for any set of workers where a majority of them
have signed cards to ask for a union.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://progressivestates.org/node/622/labor-union-majority-signup-approved-in-or-nh----and-states-demand-the-us-senate-follows-suit-&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/93">Protect Employees from Free Speech Retaliation</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/52">Rewarding Work</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/94">Extend Union Rights to Additional Employees</category>
 <category domain="http://progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/92">Workplace Speech &amp;amp; Freedom to Form Unions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:58:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21706 at http://progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
